Spring Training (414)

Spring Training is nearly over and the start of another baseball season is almost here. For all right-thinking people, namely, devout fans of the Cincinnati Reds, this time of the year is full of promise and hope, but also fear and dread that we’ll be afflicted with another 90-loss season. But it’s still March, when every team is undefeated and every fan can dream of what might be. There’s a reason baseball begins in the spring and ends in the fall. Like in nature, baseball runs the cycle from new life to certain death. Every new leaf on a tree in the spring will be one that’s raked up dead in the fall and placed in a yard-waste sarcophagus destined for mulch, which will aid in the new life and growth of other living things. Baseball reminds us of this cycle. It helps us see things clearly while also “hoping against hope” (Romans 4:18) that this year will, as legendary sportscaster Marty Brenneman would say, “belongs to the Reds!”

The brain trust of Major League Baseball, however, has decided to make changes in the game, unwittingly acknowledging that they don’t really appreciate baseball’s true metaphysical significance to the world. Commissioner Rob Manfred wants to speed up the pace of play. He points out that the average nine-inning game last year lasted three hours, which was 14 minutes longer than a decade ago. We modern folk, apparently, can’t enjoy being out in a “park” for three hours anymore. We demand our food fast and our entertainment faster. So, to combat this, Major League Baseball has instituted rule changes that limits the number of times a catcher or coach can visit the pitcher’s mound during a game (from six times to five time). They will also reduce the time between innings from 2:05 minutes to 2:00 minutes. That change alone will shave off 45 seconds from the length of the game. Progress! Other changes to speed up the game are coming in the future, like a “pitch clock” (sort of like the “shot clock” in basketball), which will require the pitcher to deliver his pitch under a certain time or have the umpire penalize the team with a called “ball.”

I get it. I understand the pressures the game is under in a culture that more and more has its attention challenged and is impatient for the next stimuli. But for me baseball has always been counter-cultural to these impulses. Part of the draw of a baseball game is to smell the hotdogs and stale beer and to hear and feel the crunch of discarded peanut shells under your feet as you make your way to your seat. It’s watching the other people who have come to game, particularly the more entertaining ones, and wonder what life is like for them. It’s loudly questioning the eyesight of the umpire when he makes a call against your team (but never questioning his parentage). But most of all, it’s watching amazingly skilled players do remarkable things, all with a break for relaxation and conversation with your friends between innings.

If we allow it, baseball will help us slow down and enjoy our time with friends and family. It’s one of the few sports that has no clock where the whole purpose of the game, with all props to George Carlin, is to come “home.” And for Cincinnati Reds fans like me, it has the highest of Christian aspirations (“the last shall be first and the first shall be last” – Matthew 20:16). Play ball!

 

You can observe a lot by just watching – Yogi Berra

As I read the words of Jesus in the Bible, whether they be in his Sermon on the Mount or in his parables, he seems to be less concerned with the purity of his disciples’ arguments or the rigidity of their doctrine and more concerned with the purity of their hearts and their steadfast commitment to live out the Good News he was ushering into the world.

Yet, like with Mr. Berra, we can observe a lot by just watching how many of us maintain a death grip on the purity of our arguments and the rigidity of our doctrines, whether in religion or in politics. My hunch is that the death grip we’ve deployed is caused by our fear that we’re somehow losing what we once hoped we could control. But that was always a fantasy. Our culture is changing and people different from people like me are now a part of the conversation about what we will become. Religious and Political leaders sense this fear and exploit it for their own ends. But such fear mongering about people who are different than me will lead only to our collective downfall.

One of my favorite episodes of the old TV series, The Twilight Zone, is about a meteor that lands near Maple Street somewhere in Middle America. Soon rumors begin on the street that aliens disguised as humans have invaded. Everyone’s electricity goes out on the block so people gather in the street. One neighbor begs for everyone to remain calm. But then the lights in his house go on, while every other house remains dark. One of his neighbors shouts that he must be an alien. As suspicion and panic overtake the street, guns are produced. In the faint distance, an “alien” is spotted and promptly shot, but when they run up to confront the alien, they discover he was no alien. He was simply a neighbor who had gone for help. The next scene is on a nearby hill where two real aliens are seen with a device that manipulates electricity. One tells the other “there’s no need to attack the humans. All you have to do is turn a few of their machines on and off and then they pick the most dangerous enemy imaginable: themselves.” Rod Serling then appears on camera concluding the episode with these words: “The tools of conquest don’t necessarily come with bombs and explosions. There are more powerful weapons; the ones found in the thoughts, attitudes, and prejudices of men.”

We seem to take great delight as a culture in arguing about who’s acceptable and who isn’t; who has the correct position on a particular issue and who doesn’t. And then we listen to the voices of those who tell us to fear those who are different than us; those on the outside of whatever side we’re on.

I’d rather spend my energy trying to follow Jesus. When we stand before the great judgment seat of Christ, I don’t think Jesus will ask you and me about the correctness of our beliefs or how rigidly we stood on principle. I believe he’ll ask if we tried in our lives to bring good news to the poor, hope to the hopeless, comfort to those who suffer, and mercy to the sinner. I may well be wrong about Judgment Day. I’ve been wrong before. But I’m willing to stake my eternal life on it.

+Scott

 

We are living in a Star Wars civilization with Stone Age emotions, medieval institutions and Godlike technology. – E.O. Wilson

The above quote is from evolutionary biologist E. O. Wilson’s book: The Social Conquest of Earth. If Wilson is correct in his contention, no wonder so many people in our culture feel diseased, or at least, ill at eased. It might also explain (at least in part) the extremist behavior we see in politics and other areas of our common life. In Wilson’s observation, our civilization and technology have far outpaced our personal, human capacity to make sense of them as well as the institutions we have to shape and manage them.

For example, medical and scientific advances have developed capacities for stem cell therapies, cloning, and gene manipulation that have moved rapidly ahead of our moral and ethical discernment about what the “good” is. And the institutions that traditionally have shaped and guided such discernment aren’t currently equipped to do so. Likewise, in an age of nuclear weapons in suit cases and unmanned predator drones with missiles in the sky, the old “Just War” constructs, first promulgated by St Augustine and later shaped more clearly by St Thomas Aquinas, are nearly impossible to apply.

I may be wrong, but I think this helps explain why so many people experience chronic anxiety these days. If you Google “Generalized Anxiety Disorder,” you will get over 5 million hits! The National Institute of Health describes Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) as “a pattern of constant worry and anxiety over many different activities and events. The main symptom is the almost constant presence of worry or tension, even when there is little or no reason to worry about them.”

Given this world as it is, we may all be tempted to reside with Booby McFerrin and just sing: “Don’t Worry, Be Happy!” But I don’t think that’s the answer. What I believe is needed is a robust eschatology based on the “sure and certain hope” we have through God’s grace in Jesus. Eschatology is the study of how things will end. With that grounding of God’s future, we can work back to our present time from that hope, using it as the lens by which we discern the difficult moral and ethical choices in front of us. Such a hope-filled lens is not a black and white roadmap, but it will give us a frame of reference that allows us to lessen our anxiety about the way things are (and how they might be heading). We make better choices when we’re not overcome by anxiety and a fear of the future.

Simply enjoining people to “be happy” isn’t robust enough. And neither is the misguided theology of the “Left Behind” series where the authors seem to know more about how things will end than Jesus claims he himself knows. A friend once noted: As Christians, when it comes to eschatology, we’re not called to be on the “program committee,” we’re called to be on the “welcoming committee.” And as the Brazilian writer, Paolo Coelho, wrote: “Everything is ok in the end, if it’s not ok, then it’s not the end.” Or maybe even better from Dame Julian: “All shall be well, and all manner of thing shall be well.”

+Scott

 

eCrozier #71

In spite of himself, Enoch couldn’t get over the expectation that the new Jesus was going to do something for him in return for his services. This was the virtue of Hope, which was made up, in Enoch, of two parts suspicion and one part lust. He had only a vague idea how he wanted to be rewarded, but he was not a boy without ambition; he wanted to become something. He wanted to better his condition until it was the best. He wanted to be THE young man of the future, like the ones in the insurance ads. He wanted, some day, to see a line of people waiting to shake his hand.
—Flannery O’Connor in Wise Blood, 1952

As we begin a new year, many people will make resolutions to turn over a new leaf, that is, to become something they haven’t been or to stop being someone they have been. This may be related to their physical selves like losing weight, starting an exercise regimen, eating more healthily, etc.  Or, it may be related to their spiritual lives: showing greater compassion to others, praying more regularly, learning to forgive those who have sinned against us, etc.

Like with most of her fictional observations about human nature, Flannery O’Connor lays bare that which is non-fiction: What is often hidden deep inside the human soul. Enoch’s hope in her short story, Wise Blood, was for the purpose of his own selfish advancement, which O’Connor says is driven by two parts suspicion and one part lust. That is not the Christian Hope, of course, but my hunch is some of Enoch’s kind of hope resides in all of us. How often is our hope for the future grounded in our suspicions and lusts and not in living under God’s gracious rule?

The Christian Hope, as our catechism defines it, is to live with confidence in newness and fullness of life, and to await the coming of Christ in glory, and the completion of God’s purpose for the world.  Sometimes, however, due to our human nature (and by that I mean our sin) we confuse the hope we want for ourselves, on one hand, and, on the other, our call as disciples to hope for God’s kingdom to come “on earth as it is heaven,” which, of course, is what we pray in the Lord’s Prayer. And thus comes the hardest question we must ask ourselves: how much of our life is spent working for the former rather than the latter?

I am not one given to making New Year’s Resolutions, but if I were to make one, then I would resolve to lessen my suspicions and lusts, which are usually based in pettiness for the purpose of self-promotion, and work with my utmost for the Kingdom of God. For one day, God’s kingdom will come and God’s purposes for the world will be completed. That’s when all the kingdoms of this world (our own little, personal kingdoms as wells the nations of the world) will become the Kingdom of our God. And on that day “He shall reign forever and ever” (OK, I am listening to Handel’s Messiah right now, so forgive me for going over the top). I am not qualified to be on the program committee for that glorious day, but my sure and certain hope is that I will be on welcoming committee.

+Scott