The human race has always produced refugees, people who’ve had to flee from violence and oppression. There’s no point in our history when this hasn’t been so. Our Christian tradition reaches back with our Hebrew forbearers to remember the crossing of the Red Sea as they fled the slavery and oppression of the Egyptians. The Exodus story is the paradigmic story of Israel. Once Israel became established as a nation the Hebrew prophets reminded the people, especially those in power, of their past as refugees and thus insisted on showing hospitality to the refugee who came anew into their land.

This story also is paradigmic for Christians. Early theologians saw the refugees at the Red Sea as experiencing a precursor to baptism. On one side they were oppressed slaves, but in passing through the waters of the Red Sea, they came out on the other side as a new community of God. Indeed, we’ve even adopted the Exodus story into our Eucharist as we proclaim Jesus as our “Passover” who is “sacrificed for us.”

Of course, the Hebrew people weren’t the first or last people to be refugees. Many people came to America as refugees from religious oppression in 17th & 18th Century Europe. They weren’t technically refugees in the strictest sense. Refugees are displaced people who desire to return home when the violence or oppression they’re fleeing comes to an end. Some might prefer to call them immigrants, those coming to a new place where they, as the words on the Statue of Liberty say, “long to be free.” But whether one is called an immigrant or a refugee, the human experience is similar: One feels displaced, ungrounded, and vulnerable in the new, unfamiliar place. All of us, to various extents, have known what it’s like to be in such a vulnerable and uncertain place.

That’s why hospitality has always been such an important Christian virtue. Those who came before us in the faith knew what it was like to be in need of it and thus insisted it be a virtue present in Christian practice everywhere. The Greek word for hospitality in the New Testament is philoxenia, which literally means “to love strangers.” It’s the exact opposite of xenophobia, which is “to fear strangers,” a disease many in our world seem to have these days. It’s natural to fear what’s different, but it’s not faithful to allow such fear to set in and determine our practice as Christians.

Some in Europe today want the refugees from the Syrian civil war to go someplace else, although it’s heartening to see how many are embracing them. My hunch is those refugees would gladly go someplace else if they could. They’d actually prefer to stay in the home that they’ve known with their friends and families. But the violence of the past years has made them desperate enough to risk life and limb to go to a safer place. That’s no different than the young folk who have in recent years showed up on our southern border fleeing the violence of gangs and drug lords in their home countries. Imagine the fear that drove them to make such a trek and the courage it took for them to make it. Christians have no borders when it comes to those suffering from violence and oppression. It’s not a minor tenet of our faith to show mercy to those who have been forced to flee their homes. It’s at the heart of our identity as Christians.

+Scott

 

Moving from Attraction to Mission (eCrozier #138)

One of the new buzz phrases going around the Church is “radical hospitality.” It sounds edgy and “out there,” doesn’t it? As I understand it, radical hospitality is a serious commitment to welcome all people to our common life in the Church no matter who they are, what they look like, and as the old Church Ad Project stated: “No matter how many times they’ve been born.” It’s a contention that since Jesus welcomed all, loving and accepting people right where they were and just as they were, so the Church must engage in such a spiritual practice with our neighbors and with no strings attached. “There are no outcasts” is another way folk in the Church have described such a practice.

By my lights, there’s much to commend in such a stance toward people outside the Church. Our churches ought to be places of pure welcome and grace. We truly ought to be communities of “radical hospitality” to the stranger. And yet, the theology behind this practice, however right and good, has tended to mask something else that we need to acknowledge and address. For the sake of argument, I would call the theology behind the movement of “radical hospitality” a “Theology of Attraction.” Such a theology holds that if we’re just open and welcoming enough people will naturally be attracted to us and want to come and join our churches.  So, with this theology we declare that all people are welcome and we will offer them “radical hospitality” when they come into our churches.

That is all well and good. But in case you have not noticed, fewer and fewer people are attracted to our churches. This is true regardless of denomination as Pew and Barna and other research organizations have pointed out. There is nothing inherently wrong and many things right with a “Theology of Attraction.” It, however, does not go far enough or address the challenges we face. A “Theology of Attraction” waits for people to come to us. We did that well for a generation. It used to be that we would buy some land, build a church, call a reasonably nice priest to serve it, open the doors on Sunday, and we would have a sustainable church in no time flat. We did that quite well as we followed the suburban sprawl of our culture in the 50s and 60s.

And now we sit in our churches like people stood up on a date.  A “Theology of Attraction” is inadequate. We need a “Theology of Mission” like the early Church had. We need to go to where the people are because they are not coming to us, no matter how attractive we might be. Our current practice is still akin to putting an empty fish tank on the beach and then waiting for the fish to jump into it. We need to realize that only the dead fish are on the beach.

We need to leave the fish tank and go into the water where the fish are. I’m all for “radical hospitality,” but we have to have people coming to our churches in order to show them such hospitality. We need a renewed “Theology of Mission” where modern day “apostles” (literally “ones who are sent out”) leave the friendly confines of our church buildings and go to where the people are. Only then will we see the renewal of God’s Church. As we say in Cursillo: “Christ is counting on you!”

+Scott