eCrozier # 59

Earlier this week, just a few blocks from the high school where my wife teaches in Washington, DC, there was gang-related murder. During a funeral procession for a young woman from the neighborhood who was murdered the week before, a rival gang opened fire on one of the cars causing it to crash killing one young man and others being critically injured. While police reports are still uncertain, they are pursuing leads related to rival “crews” (as they are called in DC) engaging in retaliation.

And less we mistakenly think that such violence is only an urban, minority problem, on the same day a 19-year-old sophomore math major at the University of Texas, Colton Tooley, opened fire with an automatic weapon sending students diving for cover. As he walked through the library firing his gun, thankfully no one was killed. Tooley killed himself before the police could get to him.

Yes, both of these incidents indicate that we have a public policy challenge as a nation when it comes balancing the right to own guns for self-protection and the right we also have to live free of fear from such incidents described above. But if we see this as only a public policy issue, then we will be horribly short-sighted. What we have is a spiritual crisis and my hunch is that it won’t be solved only by traditional conservative or liberal solutions (e.g., school prayer and stay-at-home moms from the former and more social workers and self-esteem training from the latter).

This spiritual crisis might be best summed up as the absence of what the Bible calls the “fear of God,” a profound sense of humility for our place in God’s created order.  If we place our faith in such a God; a God whose very nature is love, who commands us to love those who are nigh to us (that is, our neighbors, which literally means those near, or nigh to us); a God who incarnated that neighbor-love in Jesus who became nigh to us so that we might know God’s very nature, then such a faith would begin to change the world, at least our neighbor’s world.

What would it look like if our congregations began to fully practice such neighbor love? Well, one of my recent conclusions is that an “unemployed Mormon” is an oxymoron. That’s because, as I understand it, if a Mormon is unemployed, then on Sunday the Bishop stands and says: “We have an unemployed person in our midst. We’re not leaving today until he has a job.” You see, the Mormons believe it’s the whole church’s responsibility to ensure that person has a job so he can provide for his family.

Practicing such neighbor love would begin to address this spiritual crisis by infusing in us our responsibility for one another. We’re all part of God’s loving created order. The more connected we are to that, the less we’ll experience the disassociation that can result in someone shooting a gun to exact revenge or to randomly kill. Such neighbor love can’t be enacted into public policy nor can it be commanded by a theocratic state. It can only be practiced by communities like ours; communities who know we must practice what we preach.

+Scott

 

eCrozier #47

Dan Ariely, a behavioral economist at Duke University, has created a new iPhone app that gives users random compliments. We humans are not only sensitive to critical comments, but we also become positively responsive when we get kind, supportive words, according to Ariely’s research. Such compliments help us feel better about ourselves and even about the world around us. The compliment can come from an intimate friend or from a complete stranger, Ariely argues, and it will have the same affect. You can find this free app (called At a boy!) at http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/at-a-boy/id371156872?mt=8

The mere fact that such an app is available (and apparently popular) tells us that many people are longing for affirmation in our culture.

Now, I am not in favor inappropriate flattery or using compliments in an effort to manipulate people. Both are certainly done by people and I usually experience great disease when on the receiving end or when I witness such behavior directed at others. Besides, such flattery and manipulation has a short shelf life and does not ultimately “build up,” as St Paul would say.

Nevertheless, let us not discount the importance we should place on affirming (or complimenting) those with whom we serve. All of us can recall times when an affirming, truthful word from someone we respected made a huge difference in our work or in our ministry. It is so easy to find fault; to look at what is lacking; to focus only on what needs to be fixed, whether that be in our lives or in other people’s lives.

What if, rather than leading with those approaches, we led with finding in ourselves and others the good and the virtuous? And then, with our words and actions, we truthfully communicated that all around? My hunch is we would be engaging in a Pauline-inspired building up of our community. And if you do not know, the Church needs such building up

+Scott

 

eCrozier #40

This is the second in a series of Ecroziers on the practices of the Christian Faith

Household Economics

When considering household economics, we may think of the old high school home economics class – baking, sewing, & cleaning (yes, I took such a course). The word economics actually comes from the Greek word oikos meaning household. In Scripture oikos refers both to a place where people live (Mk 2:11; Lk 1:23) and to the people of a particular household (Lk 10:5; Lk 11:17). In the Bible, to be part of a household was to know that you belonged and that you had responsibilities in your belonging. Household economics today is still about the same thing. Who belongs in the household? How do we provide for those who belong? How does the oikos use its resources?

Such questions can make us uneasy because they refer in part to how we use money. In the Bible, we hear stories like the rich young man where Jesus tells him to sell all his possessions if he wants to be his disciple. This story hits us hard. Plus, there’s the biblical standard of giving, the tithe (2 Chronicles 31: 4-10). Giving everything away, or just giving ten percent, can be daunting in our consumer culture. Our anxiety implicitly shows just how attached we are to money and other material things.

Household economics, however, is about more than money. Household economics is how we order our households. Who is welcome? Who makes the decisions? Who and what is considered when making those decisions? Does our household stand alone or is it connected to others? Our individual households are part of a larger household, our planet. How we care for this larger household will directly effect how we care for own household. So, our individual practice of household economics impacts the larger household, the earth.

The Bible tells us that in God’s oikos, God has reordered things. As Jesus teaches us about God’s oikos, we learn the first will be last and the last will be first. We learn that the poor, the lame, the tax collectors, and others on the margins of society eat at the same table with everyone else. Jesus tells us that in God’s oikos lepers, orphans, and aliens are especially welcome. We learn in the Biblical witness that in God’s oikos gifts are given so they can be shared, not hoarded. The household economics of God call for a spirit of giving and a practice of hospitality. God’s economy is one in which there is enough for all of God’s creatures. God’s household is not just livable, but hospitable – a place in which all of God’s creatures can truly dwell. Thus, our practice of faith calls us to be intentional about the stewardship of our oikos that it may reflect the oikos of God.

+Scott