Francis & Justin (eCrozier #297)

In an eCrozier in November of 2013, I wrote that Francis had become the first “Anglican Pope.” Today, I’m even more convinced that’s the case. I wrote then: “this Pope is a man who has a deep and abiding faith in Jesus Christ, crucified and risen. His strong faith gives him the freedom to be gracious and compassionate and to approach life with humility, openness, and curiosity. Maybe that’s why he’s so confounding to so many people, both in the Roman Church and outside it.”

In his recently published document called Amoris Laetitia, or “The Joy of Love,” he didn’t issue any new doctrine. He, however, insisted that his clergy focus on the pastoral care of their flock, rather than on the judging of them. Each Roman Catholic, he contends, should listen to their individual consciences while also keeping in mind the Church’s dogma. This doesn’t mean Francis is throwing out Roman Catholic dogma. Rather, he seems to be saying that an individual’s conscience matters and if a person deep in her/his heart discerns something to be God’s will for her/his life, then that may well be the truth she/he must follow. He’s creating some “wiggle room” between the experience of the individual and the official teaching of the Church.  

We Anglicans live in that “wiggle room,” not because we’re “soft on sin” or because we don’t believe Jesus or the Mosaic Law taught us moral behavior, but because we know that life is usually messy, that we don’t always make the right choices (not a news flash), and that such “wiggle room” is where we often experience the powerful thrust of God’s grace in our lives. Pope Francis calls upon his flock, and particularly his clergy, to “examine the actual situation of families, in order to keep firmly grounded in reality.” Whenever we put rules above people’s lives, then we tend to get hard-hearted, caring more about the rules than the people who are called to keep them. Yes, Francis acknowledges that Jesus set forth a demanding ideal for his disciples, but in doing so Jesus “never failed to show compassion and closeness to the frailty of individuals.”

And then we have Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, who recently received news that the man he thought was his biological father, Gavin Welby, actually wasn’t. Instead the Archbishop learned that it was Sir Anthony Montague Browne who for many years was the private secretary to Winston Churchill. In explaining what happened, the Archbishop’s mother wrote that right before her wedding to Gavin Welby, she was “fuelled by a large amount of alcohol” and “went to bed with Anthony Montague Browne.” Such news could’ve become the brunt of tabloid snickering, but the Archbishop addressed this news with grace and compassion toward his mother recognizing that she was an alcoholic at the time and suffered from its addiction. He wrote that he and his wife have faced much harder news in their lives (they had baby daughter who was killed years ago in a car accident). He ended by saying: “I find who I am in Jesus Christ, not in genetics, and my identity in him never changes.”

Two remarkable disciples of Jesus modeling for us how to follow our Lord with grace and compassion for others (and also for themselves).

+Scott

 

The field of moral psychology endeavors to understand why people make moral choices and the rationale they use to justify their choices. One of moral psychology’s recurring findings is that we have a higher opinion of ourselves than we ought to have. Of course, St. Paul arrived at the same conclusion about human nature nearly 2000 years ago when he wrote that very same message to the Church in Rome (Romans 12:3).

Experiments and surveys have repeatedly shown that we believe we possess attributes that are better or more desirable than the average person. For example, we believe by a wide majority that we’re above average drivers. The same is true when we’re asked about a virtue such as honesty. A high percentage of us report that we’re more honest than the average person. Even folk in jail for theft report such superior honesty. High school students consistently judge themselves to be more popular than average. And nearly every state claims that their average student test scores are above the national average. Of course, since we know something about statistics, we know that such judgments about ourselves cannot be true.

Moral psychologists have termed this phenomenon The Lake Wobegon Effect. It’s named for the fictional town of Lake Wobegon from the radio program A Prairie Home Companion, where, according to host Garrison Keillor: “All the women are strong, all the men are good looking, and all the children are above average.”

What these moral psychologists are documenting is as old as humanity. Our tradition names it as sin born from the cardinal sin of pride. Our creation story reminds us that Adam & Eve were quite clear that their judgment about a particular fruit in the Garden of Eden was superior to God’s judgment.

This truth about ourselves needs to be front and center when we spread the Good News of Jesus Christ. Yes, when sharing our faith with those who aren’t Christians we do need to have a “I-know-something-you-don’t-know” quality to it, because we do “know something they don’t know” when it comes to God’s grace in Jesus. But it’s how we share our faith with others that matters. It should be humble. We’re not morally superior to those outside the Christian faith. We may not even be morally above average.

So, from this humble stance, what is it we are to share?

I want to propose three Bible verses that will help remind us of how we should spread the Good News of Jesus.

The first verse is Isaiah 55:1: “Ho, everyone who thirsts, come to the waters; and you that have no money, come, buy and drink!

Notice how the Prophet Isaiah pronounces God’s word here. Everyone who thirsts is invited. All should come and drink and eat without money or price. God’s invitation to humanity is complete and without condition. Isaiah’s prophecy is a bold declaration of God’s intention, made perfect in Jesus’ words in John’s Gospel, that Jesus when he is lifted up on the cross will draw all people to himself.

That means Jesus is doing the drawing. Our congregations then must be places where we’re trained for our role, not Jesus’ role. It may be a conversation you have in the living room at Columba House. It may be you comforting an exhausted Scout Leader after his troop meets one night at your church. It may be you listening to a co-worker over coffee about her current troubles. Whenever and wherever, we need to say to everyone in our communities: “Ho, everyone who thirsts, come!”

The second verse is Isaiah 25:9: “Lo, this is our God; we have waited for him, so that he might save us.”

Spreading the Good News involves us waiting for God to act. Our salvation, indeed the world’s salvation, isn’t our own doing. But our waiting should never be passive. It must be an active waiting, all the while recognizing that salvation is God’s action and God’s property, not ours.

If we remember that, then we’ll maintain a humble stance with those outside of our faith. Even though the Gospel is God’s bold declaration to the world, we should be compassionate and tender in how we share it, because we know many people have only received a false, toxic version of the Gospel.

Waiting for God to save is actually liberating. We’re free from playing the age-old game of who’s in and who’s out. We can collaborate with anyone, regardless of their faith, if they’re willing to do Gospel work with us in our communities.

If someone wants to partner with the Food for a Thousand Ministry at St Patrick’s, Albany or the community garden at the Oak Street Mission in Thomasville, we won’t worry if they don’t share our faith. We’ll feed hungry people with anyone. The Community Cares Café in Darien serves children whether or not they or their parents believe as we do. After all, we’re not on God’s “Program Committee.” We’re on God’s “Welcoming Committee.”

“Lo, it is God who saves us.” And we’ll share that Good News with anyone.

And the third and final verse is Matthew 28:19: “Go, make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”

It’s not a liturgical accident that each Sunday our deacons send us out with this short, powerful verb: “Go!” “Go” doesn’t mean, “stay.” “Go” doesn’t mean hang out inside the church walls until somebody shows up. And “Go” doesn’t mean being so hamstrung by political correctness that we refrain from sharing with others God’s forgiveness in Jesus. “Go” means, “Go!”  

Go into the communities of this diocese with a “humble boldness.” Go share good news with the poor. Go tell the spiritually blind that God wants to give them sight. Go speak to the spiritually thirsty and let them know how you’ve learned that Jesus is the Water of Life.

Go to everyone. Go to the NSA, the NRA, the NAACP, the Rotarians, the Elks Club, the Booster Club, the Garden Club, the Optimist’s Club, the Pessimist’s Club, just Go! Wherever God has placed you, Go!

When we actually do go, God does some amazing things.

  • The community youth group in McIntosh County decided to go and this last year we baptized five young people.
  • The Cornerstone Ministry in Augusta chose to go and now regularly has 35 or more youth participate. And some of those aren’t members of our churches. They’re being evangelized by our youth.
  • In the summer when we go to Lake Blackshear with the Good News, people respond. Because the people of Christ Church Cordele decided to go, their worship attendance has doubled in the last few years.

What might God do in our communities if we all decided to “go?” Because when we “go,” we discover God’s already there. When we go to the ends of the earth or just to the end of our block, we find Jesus already pitching his tent there.

My friends, I firmly believe that the future vitality of this Diocese is directly related to our collective willingness to “go.” Our vitality will only grow in direct proportion to the number of us who are willing to “go.” And, this going can’t be a clergy-centered movement. A few laity still think that since we pay many of our clergy to go, they themselves don’t have to go. But that’s not true. The clergy’s primary task is to equip the laity to be the ministers of the Gospel. As the great lay teacher & preacher Verna Dozier wrote: The layperson’s primary function is out there in the world.  And the wise Archbishop of Canterbury, William Temple, wrote: Nine-tenths of the Church’s work in the world is done by Christian people fulfilling responsibilities and performing tasks which in themselves are not part of the official system of the Church at all.

That means when we “go,” we don’t go to church, we “go” to the people and places of our lives taking the Good News of Jesus with us. And if the Good News of Jesus saves us, it will save anybody and everybody.

I know I’ve gone a bit long here, but please stay with me for a few more minutes. I want to end on a personal note. Some of you know that I was diagnosed with cancer two months ago. I’m happy to report to you that I’m cancer free today. And I’m most thankful for all of your prayers. I felt each one of them.

The Diocesan Staff has been amazing, as usual, dealing with their already full responsibilities while also picking up after me, which is nearly an impossible task.

I also couldn’t do even one small thing as the Bishop of Georgia if it weren’t for Kelly, who puts up with me even as I am and loves me anyway, far beyond what I deserve.

There were upsides to my getting cancer. It’s been a great excuse for getting out of stuff. When someone asked me to do something I didn’t want to do, all I had to do was say: “You know, I’d love to, but I have cancer.” That worked every time.

The other upside is that it’s sharpened my mind and soul. It’s helped me see how often I’ve taken for granted the truly wonderful people and blessings that surround me.

And cancer has helped me get clear about what I want my life to stand for and how I want to spend the rest of my days on this earth, however long that is.

So, to quote that wonderful hymn by the Reverend James Cleveland:

Right now, I don’t feel no ways tired!

I’m ready to “go!” And I hope you’re ready to “go,” too.

Ho, everyone who thirsts, come to the waters”

Lo, this is our God who has saved us.”

Go, make disciples”

Deacons, please stand now wherever you are.  Please help me dismiss all of us from this overly long address with one powerful verb. It begins with a G and it ends with an O. On the count of three: One, two, three – Go!

 

Power, Privilege, & Discipleship (eCrozier #276)

Whoever wishes to be great among you must be your servant – Mark 10:43b

If we want greatness, Jesus says, then we must be willing to live our lives upside down compared to the rest of the world. This is the essence of discipleship that James and John missed in their interaction with Jesus in this Sunday’s Gospel reading. It’s one, however, we dare not miss.

For the first part of my life, I missed it completely. When I was younger, I used to think that being a disciple of Jesus meant becoming personally pious. And, as a young adult, I did. You’d have been proud of me. I lived by the motto: “I don’t smoke, drink, or chew, or go with girls who do!” I was the model young adult. I even won the American Legion “God and Country” award at my high school. Impressed, aren’t you? But what marked my so-called discipleship back then was not what I did, but what I didn’t do. About the only thing I did was carry my Bible around. This, I figured, would show my discipleship to the world. But no one cared. No one persecuted me for doing so (sorry Fox News). Most people thought it was nice and cute and everybody should have their own thing.

My discipleship was based on empty piety. I was no different than the disciples, James and John. They wanted power and privilege because of their closeness to Jesus. I wanted it as a reward for my pious behavior. But I was clueless. My Jesus, at the time, was an upwardly mobile savior. He was the exact replica of the world’s standard of power and privilege. I thought that if I just was pious enough, I could have a seat next to him in eternity. My problem was that there was no blood on the cross of my Jesus. It was squeaky clean and neatly polished. My Jesus rewarded inane, pious behavior.

But the Jesus of the Gospel says: “the foxes have holes, the birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has no where to lay his head.” If I wanted to be his disciple, then I had to accept that I might just end up like him. I better be willing to be baptized with his baptism and to drink the cup he drank. I’ve by no means lived fully into his baptism and his cup. That is my confession and it occupies most of my prayer life. I’m still learning to let go of my unholy desire for power and privilege and to live into a life of service and sacrifice. It’s a daily prayer of mine. I know it’s the right road to be on, but I am a sinner, so I fail more days than not.

But some might not see it as the right road to be on. Some might wonder if this upside down Kingdom really exists, and if it does, is it the right one? Some might think that only a fool would turn his back on the way the world plays the game of power and privilege. After all, it’s a well-known axiom that you need power to get anything done. It might seem foolish not to play by the world’s rules of power and privilege. And yet, our faith tells us that the kingdoms of this world are doomed to pass away; even the kingdom known as the United States of America is doomed to pass away. Only God’s Kingdom is eternal. So, I’d rather, in the end, throw my lot in with God’s Kingdom knowing it’s one based on mercy for an almost daily failure like me.

 

Not long after Francis, Bishop of Rome, left the United States a media frenzy broke out. It seems while he was at the Vatican Embassy in Washington, D.C., he met with a number of people those serving at the Embassy had arranged for him to meet. He greeted them, encouraged them in their faith, and then was whisked off to New York to continue his visit there. Among those whom he greeted that day was none other than Ms. Kim Davis, the now well-known County Clerk in Rowan County, Kentucky. As you may recall, she was willing to go to jail rather than issue marriage licenses (just one part of her job) to homosexual couples who desired to be legally married.

Once this meeting became known in the media, the outrage started. It seemed Francis, who many on the political left had embraced as being “on their side,” had met with “the enemy.” The bewildered cries of “how could he?” arose. Many felt he had betrayed them or their particular cause. Others said that they knew all along he was “that way.” Some, trying to explain this apparent aberration, said staff at the Vatican Embassy must have bamboozled him. There was no way he could have known about everyone with whom he met that day. Surely he never would have knowingly met with her? They had hoped Francis would be loyal to their political tribe. Of course, other political tribes, those that support Ms. Davis’ position, were beside themselves with joy, smugness, and relief. Meeting with her proved Francis was really loyal to their tribe after all.

Most folk want (or need?) to put Francis in a particular political box. But he, to my great delight, doesn’t care whether he satisfies the needs of political tribalism. He is, after all, serious about following Jesus. That means he is less concerned about partisan politics and the culture wars in which we wallow and more focused on living in the world in a way that reflects the claims of Jesus on his life. All this media drama showed was how little most people know about what it means to follow Jesus, who in his earthly ministry never cared about what others thought of him when he met or hung out with the mixed-bag characters we read about in the Gospels.

The late Dom Helder Camara was the Roman Church’s Bishop of Recife in Brazil from 1964 to 1985. During his episcopacy a brutal military dictatorship ruled the country. While bishop, he wrote:  Let no one be scandalized if I frequent those who are considered unworthy or sinful. Who is not a sinner? Let no one be alarmed if I am seen with compromised or dangerous people, on the left or the right. Let no one bind me to a group. My door, my heart, must be open to everyone, absolutely everyone. In writing this, the bishop was not shrinking back one bit from his long-standing prophetic witness against the dictatorship in his country. The dictators of Brazil in his day consistently labeled him a Communist. They, too, needed a political box in which to place him. Yet he, like Francis, was merely seeking to follow Jesus, always and everywhere.

We should expect nothing less from those who call us to follow Jesus in his Church, whether they be the Bishop of Rome, the Bishop of Recife, or if he is somehow up to it, the current person who is the Bishop of Georgia.

+Scott

 

Our Anglican tradition provides us with tried and tested practices that, if lived into, profoundly shape our discipleship. These spiritual practices, or disciplines, are specifically enumerated in what’s often called a Rule of Life. Such a Rule provides coherence and shape to our daily lives. The consistency created by a Rule creates space for us to rest in God, to listen in obedience to God’s word for us, and thus to be open to the continual conversion of our life so it may be lived, as St Paul says, “not for ourselves, but for Christ Jesus.” So variety, novelty, and surprise aren’t helpful in a Rule. They’re the last things we need. When such things don’t distract us, we have the capacity and space to listen to God, which is a needful thing if we’re to live as disciples of Jesus.

My friend, Fr Ken Leech, loved to tell the story of Fr Neville who was a long-serving chaplain at a theological college in England. Fr Neville was quite committed to his Rule of Life and its spiritual discipline. His Rule shaped the whole of his life and ministry. He was much loved by the college’s students and faculty for his gentle demeanor and good humor. While they found him to be a bit of an odd duck, they cherished and valued his witness to them of a life given over to God. Every afternoon, part of Fr Neville’s daily spiritual practice was to take a nap from 2 pm to 4 pm. Regardless of what was going on in his life, in the life of the college, or in the life of the world, at 2 pm he’d stop whatever he was doing, retire to his quarters, and take that nap.

One morning, the dean of the college received an urgent message that the bishop of the diocese needed to see him that very afternoon. This presented the dean with a dilemma. He was hosting a visiting bishop from Africa and this bishop was scheduled to speak and then to lead a symposium for the entire student body and faculty that afternoon. The dean couldn’t stand up the bishop (hear, hear!), so he went to Fr Neville and asked him to host the visiting bishop for the rest of the day, introduce him at the symposium, and close the gathering with prayer. This visiting bishop was scheduled to speak at 2 pm.

Fr Neville readily agreed to stand in for the dean. The dean, much relieved, made plans for his trip to the bishop’s office. That day after lunch, Fr Neville met with the visiting bishop, and after a good visit during which they became acquainted, he escorted him to the auditorium for the symposium. Fr Neville welcomed the students and faculty, gave a warm and thoughtful introduction of the esteemed visiting bishop, and as the bishop came to the podium, Fr Neville quietly excused himself and went to his quarters to take his nap. He arose, as was his custom, at 4 pm and returned to the auditorium just in time for the symposium to conclude. He stepped to podium, thanked the visiting bishop for an outstanding presentation, and closed the symposium with a prayer.

While I’ve always found this story “laugh out loud funny,” I’ve also appreciated what it’s taught me about my own spiritual practice. As Jesus helped Martha see in Luke 10: 40-42: We are worried and distracted by many things; there is need of only one thing.” Jesus knows us better than we know ourselves, doesn’t he? A Rule of Life helps us all to create the capacity to choose what Jesus clearly called “the better part.”

+Scott

 

Since we’re now in Ascensiontide (you can look it up), I’m reminded of one of my favorite icons of the Ascension: The disciples are gathered in a circle with their eyes gazing into heaven. And just at the top of the icon one can see just the feet and ankles of Jesus as he ascends. That icon serves as a cautionary tale for the Church. We can spend much of our time figuratively looking into the heavens. We can focus so much of our energies on the fine details of liturgy or the intensity of committee work that we fail to look out at a world that’s dying for the Gospel of Jesus. There’s an old Johnny Cash song that sums this up well. It’s called “You’re so heavenly minded, you’re no earthly good.”

Now there’s nothing wrong with looking into the heavens. We all need time for rest and retreat so we might gain wisdom and perspective on our lives. The temptation, however, is to stay there. As long as we look up, we don’t have to look out for one another. We don’t have to deal with the hard work of human community. With our eyes to the heavens, we can honestly report that we can’t see the pain and struggle of others.

That’s why, I believe, those two men approached the disciples as Jesus disappeared from their sight. They pointedly asked the disciples: “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking up toward heaven?” Nineteen Centuries later, Bishop Frank Weston asked a similar question as he addressed the Church of England at the height of the Industrial Revolution. He asked: Can we claim to worship Jesus in the Church if we do not show Jesus compassion in the street? Can we worship Jesus in the Sacrament of his Body & Blood while we are ignoring Jesus in the suffering of his sisters and brothers?

A poem written by the Orthodox nun, Maria Skobtsova, illustrates this charge. She practiced and lived radical hospitality in her ministry in Paris during World War II.

I searched for thinkers and prophets who wait by the ladder to heaven,
see signs of the mysterious end, sing songs beyond our comprehension.

And I found people restless, orphaned, poor, drunk, despairing, useless,
lost whichever way they went, homeless, naked, lacking bread.

There are no prophecies. But life performs in a prophetic manner;
The end approaches, the days grow shorter; You took a servant’s form — Hosanna

When the Nazis invaded, Jews began coming to her convent in Paris to get baptismal certificates, which she gladly provided them to fool the Nazis. Later, many came to live in her convent and she helped most escape. Eventually the Nazis closed the convent and took her to a prison camp in Germany. On Holy Saturday, 1945, just days before the war’s end, she was executed. As Maria suggests in her poem, we can wait by the ladder to heaven for all sorts of “signs, thinkers, and prophets.” But if we do, we’ll miss the restless, the lost, and the despairing ones. Our Lord’s Ascension proclaims to us that you and I have the privilege of leaving the safety of our church buildings to follow Jesus into this beautiful, yet broken and hurting, world he so loves. 

+Scott

 

 

Making a whip of cords, he drove all of them out of the temple. – John 2:15

We’re more accustomed to a different Jesus, aren’t we? The Sunday School image of Jesus as the gentle good shepherd carrying a baby lamb on his shoulders still resonates with us. So when Jesus takes a whip and clears the temple, we’re taken aback. His action doesn’t fit our Sunday School image. But maybe such an image is mistaken? Some believe Christians should never get angry because Jesus never did. Well, he did. There’s nothing wrong with anger when it’s directed toward pursuing justice for God’s children.

We shouldn’t sit idly by while people suffer injustice. In fact, I’d say that if we’re not angered by injustice, then we’re not being faithful to the Gospel. It’s anger with injustice that leads us to confront the sin of racism. It’s anger with state-sponsored vengeance murder that compels us to end capital punishment. It’s anger with our society’s indifference to homeless people that leads us to work for safe housing for everyone. We should be angry when we see God’s creation polluted or God’s people brutalized.

Some of us, however, have adopted an insular spirituality. Pursuing spirituality is very popular these days. People want to become more spiritual. But much of what is called being spiritual” has no basis in the Bible. Biblically speaking, there’s no separation between our spiritual connection to God and our pursuit of justice for God’s people. The Great Commandment sums this up: Jesus says that loving God and loving our neighbor go hand in hand. We can’t love one without also loving the other. And we can’t love our neighbors without seeking justice for them. It’s just not biblically possible.

But that’s what some people do. They’re just interested in their spiritual growth as if such growth can be separated from justice. The Bible claims a wholeness of spirituality and justice, of prayer and action, of contemplation and its inextricable connection to God’s justice. If we wish to be spiritual, we should help a child learn to read. If we wish to be spiritual, we should help a hungry person find the food they need. If we wish to be spiritual, we should rebuke that colleague when he makes a racist or homophobic joke.

Yet, working for justice will be rudderless and random if it’s not grounded in the faith of the Church, for that’s where we learn how to order our lives so we’ll avoid a superficial spirituality or a definition of justice that simply mirrors a political party at prayer.

The pursuit of God’s justice needs to begin with our own self-examination and fearless personal inventory. Before we can point our finger at anybody else, we need to point the finger at ourselves and allow our anger to motivate us to change how we live. We must admit that in some ways we’re no different than the buyers and the sellers Jesus confronted in the temple. When our lives in the Church are turned over by Jesus the same way he turned over the temple tables, then we’ll begin to learn to be the Church. Then we will live holistic lives where our spirituality isn’t disconnected from seeking justice for God’s children.

+Scott

 

Among our tasks as witnesses to the love of Christ is that of giving a voice to the cry of the poor. – Pope Francis addressing, Justin, Archbishop of Canterbury

I get a lot of emails telling me how to be a better bishop, why I’m wrong about this or that issue, or how I’d be acceptable to the writer if I just did what they want. And then there are my favorite emails, ones beginning with something like: “How dare you…” If I followed each directive of my correspondents, then I’d be more of a mess than I am and I’d probably end up on the floor mumbling incoherently in a straight jacket.

I recently received some emails criticizing our Church’s work rebuilding our cathedral in Haiti, the one that was destroyed by the earthquake in January 2010. Some of these folks told me that with the deep poverty in Haiti, it was just wrong for us to raise millions of dollars to rebuild our cathedral there. Such money should go to poverty relief. Other emails came at it from a different direction: the Haitian people were corrupt and simply incapable of managing anything by themselves. They would just waste whatever we gave them and nothing would change.

These two criticisms might be characterized respectively as first a liberal one, and second, as a conservative one. What both of these criticisms have in common is that they approach their position first through a secular, socio-political lens. Sadly, I see this a lot from disciples of Jesus. For example, when I read Facebook postings from Christians, their critique of an issue often seems to come a priori from their socio-political outlook. Then they often try to find a way to fit in the Gospel to justify their position. Shouldn’t it be the other way around with our politics being shaped by the Gospel?

Whether it be the proper role of government in the U.S., or addressing the scandal of hungry children in our communities, or how best to help the Haitian people, we must begin with the lens of the Gospel of Jesus. At times that will make disciples of Jesus seem liberal and at other times it’ll make us look conservative to the larger world. And sometimes it’ll make us just appear crazy to those not shaped by the radical grace of the Good News of Jesus. Too many of us are hung up on trying to be consistently liberal or unswervingly conservative rather than constantly faithful to the teachings of Jesus. That means our politics shape our discipleship. And it should be the other way around.

This isn’t to suggest that there are clear programmatic answers found in the teachings of Jesus on how to alleviate poverty or the related issue of “income inequality.” But it’s to suggest that if we aren’t working hard to help the poor, then we’re plainly ignoring Jesus. Poor people should haunt every disciple of Jesus. I hear some Christians blame poor people for being poor as if it were some sort of “just dessert.” I hear others who think that if we just had the right government program, then it would absolve them from any direct responsibility. Both are shaping their respective responses through the wrong lens. We’re never going to get this completely right this side of heaven, but all our efforts should proceed directly from the grace incarnated in the Gospel of Jesus.

+Scott

 

Much scholarly work has been written in the last few years delving into the source of human morality. Those who come at the issue from an evolutionary stance seek to explain morality as a result of natural selection. To wit: Good morality grows over time because our forbearers learned that cooperating with one another created safer, more thriving communities. Of course, that raises the obvious question: Why do we still have so much violence and war? Joshua Greene in his book, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them, answers that question by arguing humans evolved in tribal groups, so our morality evolved in a way that naturally distrusts people outside one’s tribe. This was less problematic when tribes lived far apart and weren’t connected by modern technology, but now tribes are geographically and technologically close, thus conflict increases. His proposed remedy is a shared global morality that would settle arguments among competing moral tribes. But as Alisdair MacIntyre argued years ago (1988) in his book, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, whose morality gets chosen? Greene, as one could expect, offers his own, a version of classic utilitarianism.

The problem is as Walt Kelly’s Pogo the Possum said in the Okefenokee Swamp: “We have met the enemy and he is us.” What evolutionary psychologists have proffered makes sense. We tend to have a high opinion of our own tribe’s virtue while having a much lower opinion of another tribe’s virtues. We then each amplify our resentments toward one another based on our tribal opinions. It seems we (that is, our brains) don’t clearly recognize our own sins all the while having 20/20 vision on the sins of other tribes. Once one tribe is convinced that another tribe’s values, practices, etc. are sinful and that other tribe actually has contempt for one’s own practices and values, then conflict is pretty much assured. For example, we can look at the long-standing conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. Both actually share similar values, one being retributive justice, namely, that if attacked, you’re justified if you retaliate. So they do, again and again. It becomes a playground argument of who first started the fight. Since they share the tribal value of retributive justice, they have to amplify the sins of the other tribe to retain the moral high ground. Their tribal brains just work that way, if one accepts Greene’s hypothesis (also true for the Republican and the Democratic tribes).

While I find all this fascinating, in some ways it doesn’t matter whether we evolved into this particular form of tribal morality or, as I believe, God has revealed to us morality. Either way, we have to deal with this brutal tribalism, both in the world and among our most nigh neighbors. Jesus knew all this. That’s why his teaching on forgiveness and loving one’s enemies is so vitally relevant today. But it’s also, if Greene and others are to be believed, not how our brains have evolved to work. It’s counter-intuitive to our brains to forgive and love our enemies. That probably explains why it’s such hard work for us and why such love and forgiveness aren’t regularly practiced virtues by many Christians. Yet, it’s the only way Jesus has given his disciples for living in this world. So even if one doesn’t accept the truth of the Gospel, it seems that following Jesus is the only way we can further evolve our brains so that tribalism won’t destroy what God has so beautifully created. Start with the tribe next door.

+Scott

 

There are different views of human nature. Some believe we’re inherently good, while others see humans as inherently sinful. Even others hold the view that we’re both good and sinful at the same time, that is, we’re capable of acts of profound goodness as well as acts that we would only be able to call sin. Are we born this way as mixed bags? Or do we learn both the good and the sinful? There’s Biblical and psychological evidence on both sides. Is it nurture or nature that forms us?

As Episcopalians, it shouldn’t surprise us to know that our Church comes down squarely in the middle of these questions. We put a lot of stock in the discipleship process because we know that the only way one becomes a faithful disciple of Jesus is by learning from others what that looks like. We also believe that this is God’s doing. “God is the potter and we are the clay,” as the Prophet Jeremiah put it (18:6). But we also hold the belief in what has traditionally been called original sin. We are “fallen” like Adam and Eve. Part of us rebels mightily against living under the gracious rule of God.

So we make the choice to follow Jesus knowing full well that we’re rebels under God’s rule. The only way to live faithfully (as the mixed bags we are) is to discipline our lives in such ways that we learn to live Good News, that is, to extend to ourselves and to others the unmerited, grace-filled forgiveness God has extended to the whole world in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. This disciplining process is what Christian formation is all about. It’s a process by which we apprentice ourselves to mature Christians who have much to teach us about living grace-filled lives. This isn’t an overnight process. St Paul spent 13 years being apprenticed by others before he set out as a missionary. Christian Formation is not unlike learning to lay brick or a musical instrument. It’s the rare person indeed who can pick up the trowel or the violin and master it from the start. Most have to work years to become merely proficient at, let alone master, such skills. Just because we go to Church for a while and read a book or two of the Bible doesn’t mean that we have the whole disciple-grace-forgiveness-God’s-one-way-love thing all worked out.

And being a disciple of Jesus would be simpler if it weren’t for the fact that we’re also being discipled by other people and things to follow someone or something other than Jesus. For example, some people are discipled to be winners at all cost. Some are discipled to be abusers of life. Some are discipled to be greedy, selfish, and indifferent to the lives of others. This is rarely an obvious or formal process, yet the young boy who is taught to violently hate others because of their race or sexual orientation is being groomed and discipled for that day when he can teach his own children the same vile. Should it surprise us then when that in fact happens?

You and I are called to form ourselves in Jesus who extended his one-way love to the whole world on the cross. It’s a lifetime formation project grounded in the truth of God’s amazing grace. Be patient with yourself and with others in this project. It’s not easy. But we know this: All else will fail us every time.

+Scott